Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 18 (0.35 seconds)Section 80IA in The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Section 22 in The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs Noida Toll Bridge Co. Ltd. on 28 January, 2003
11. The Hon'ble Allahabad High Court in the case of CIT v.
Noida Toll Bridge Co. Ltd. 213 Taxman 333, after considering
6 ITA. Nos. 1184-1189/Hyd/2013
M/s. Swarna Tollway Pvt. Ltd.
Transmission Corpn. Of Ap. Ltd. vs Acit [Alongwith Sp Nos. 25 To 28/H/05 In ... on 24 February, 2005
e) Ashoka Info (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT [2010] 35 SOT 50 (Pune).
Commissioner Of Income-Tax Bombay Etc vs Podar Cement Pvt. Ltd. Etc on 27 May, 1997
10. Further, in the case of CIT v. Podar Cement (P.)
Transfer of Property Act, 1977
Section 35D in The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
The Income Tax Act, 1961
State Of U.P. And Ors vs Renusagar Power Co. And Others on 28 July, 1988
7. Further, we find that the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case
of Mysore Minerals Ltd. v. CIT (239 ITR 775) (SC) had
considered the meaning of word "owner" after referring to R.B.
Jodha Mal Kuthiala v. CIT (82 ITR 570); CIT v. Podar Cement
Pvt. Ltd. (226 ITR 625); P.K. Badiyani v. CIT (105 ITR 642) and
State of UP v. Renusagar Power Co., AIR 1988 SC 1737, it was
held that :