Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.18 seconds)
Mahinkutty vs Dominic Ceaser Pazhampilly on 2 April, 2025 cites

National Insurance Co. Ltd vs Pranay Sethi on 31 October, 2017

14. On the date of accident, the petitioner was aged 43 years. Therefore, 25% of the monthly income is to be added towards future prospects, MACA NO. 1239 OF 2016 5 2025:KER:28345 as held in the decision in National Insurance Co. Ltd v. Pranay Sethi [(2017) 16 SCC 680] and the multiplier to be applied is 14, as held in Sarla Verma v. Delhi Transport Corporation, [(2009) 6 SCC 121]. In the above circumstances, the loss of disability will come to Rs.3,40,200/-.
Supreme Court of India Cites 32 - Cited by 9815 - D Misra - Full Document

Sarla Verma & Ors vs Delhi Transport Corp.& Anr on 15 April, 2009

14. On the date of accident, the petitioner was aged 43 years. Therefore, 25% of the monthly income is to be added towards future prospects, MACA NO. 1239 OF 2016 5 2025:KER:28345 as held in the decision in National Insurance Co. Ltd v. Pranay Sethi [(2017) 16 SCC 680] and the multiplier to be applied is 14, as held in Sarla Verma v. Delhi Transport Corporation, [(2009) 6 SCC 121]. In the above circumstances, the loss of disability will come to Rs.3,40,200/-.
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 20141 - R V Raveendran - Full Document
1