Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (0.60 seconds)The Companies Act, 1956
Section 17 in The Employees' Provident Funds Scheme, 1952 [Entire Act]
The Employees’ Provident Funds And Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952
Section 7A in The Employees’ Provident Funds And Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 [Entire Act]
Loomtex Engineering Pvt. Ltd. & Ors vs Chief Provident Fund Commissioner & Ors on 6 December, 2018
We find that the status of Loomtex Engineering
Pvt. Ltd.& Ors. and those of the petitioners in
this bunch of writ petitions, were not similar so
far as the question of exempted category and/or
unexempted category was concerned. Therefore,
the Loomtex Engineering Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. (supra)
was neither the decision on the issue involved in
this bunch of writ petitions nor there was any
scope to arrive at a conclusion with regard to the
issues involved in this a bunch of writ petitions, as
discussed hereinabove.
Section 14B in The Employees’ Provident Funds And Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 [Entire Act]
Section 7B in The Employees’ Provident Funds And Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 [Entire Act]
Caledonian Jute & Industries Ltd. & Anr vs Union Of India & Ors on 14 November, 2011
10) Now the matter is before this Court to pass the final orders
in WPA 6138(W) of 2009, Caledonian Jute & Industries Ltd.
& Anr. vs Union of India & Ors. as per the direction of the
larger bench, along with 19 other writ applications on
similar issue in the said bunch of writ applications. In
course of hearing, three (3) more writ applications on similar
issue have been added and are taken together for disposal,
in all 20 (twenty).