Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.58 seconds)
S.B.Patil Dental College And Hospital ... vs State Of Karntaka And Ors on 4 September, 2020 cites

Dr Swamy Manjunath S T vs State Of Karnataka on 21 December, 2018

(c) The students happen to be the beneficiaries of violation of law of course, committed by the colleges, also cannot be lost sight of; justice of the case echoes that they cannot be permitted to go completely free, regardless of their arguable guiltlessness; they need to render community service as a consideration for retaining the benefit of admission to the course, which the colleges have done in a manifest breach of law; their 42 counsel too cottoned with our view that they should render service for a short period and on stipend; we are of the considered opinion that one year rural service will mete out justice to all; this view of ours is consistent with the cognate legislative measure in the State namely, the enacting of Karnataka Compulsory Service Training by Candidates Completed Medical Courses Act, 2015; the authorities of the State need to take all appropriate steps to ensure the compliance with the direction for community service keeping in view the decisions of this court in Dr. Swamy Manjunath & Ors. vs. State of Karnataka & Ors. 2019 (2) Kar.
Karnataka High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 4 - K S Dixit - Full Document

Miss Srinija Dasari vs Rajiv Gandhi University Of Health ... on 3 April, 2014

(d) It also needs to be noticed that the Co-ordinate Bench referred to another decision of a learned Single Judge, dated 03.04.2014 in Miss Srinija Dasari & Ors. vs. University & Ors. in W.P.51397-938/2013 & connected matters as well, which is heavily pressed into service by the petitioners herein for the proposition that "if the available seats are more than the candidates who are otherwise eligible for admission, the holding of an entrance test to assess their inter se merit would be unnecessary and meaningless"; we do not subscribe to that view for more than one reason: if that view were to be the correct legal position universally applicable to BDS admissions for all the academic years, the Co- ordinate Bench would have stated it in so many words, which it has consciously not; on the contrary, it restricted the application of its decision to the 27 admissions of the year 2013-14 as already mentioned above and that too for the students of the petitioner- college therein; this apart, a perusal of the Co-ordinate Bench judgment shows that the view taken therein is laced with a kind of concession from the respondent side; the questions which we have framed above, having not been fully debated.
Karnataka High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 1 - A Byrareddy - Full Document
1