Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 18 (0.35 seconds)The Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017
Section 8 in The Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [Entire Act]
Promila Taneja vs Surendri Design Pvt. Ltd on 10 November, 2020
We observe that the
Judgements relied upon by the Learned Counsel for the Appellant namely
'M. Ravindranath Reddy' (Supra) and 'Promila Taneja' (Supra), were held to
be bad in law.
M/S.Duro Flex Pvt. Limited vs M/S.Duroflex Sittings System on 27 April, 2015
9. The Learned Counsel for the Respondent submitted that the Hon'ble
High Court of Madras in 'Duro Flex (P) Limited' Vs. 'Duroflex Sittings
System', (2014) SCC OnLine Mad 8968, examined the issue of jurisdiction
of the Court in case of infringement of the trademark and observed that the
right and interest in a trademark is a 'Movable Property'.
Shabbir Medical Hall vs Mohammed Naseer on 26 February, 2010
The Hon'ble
Madras High Court has considered the Judgements passed in 'Shabbir
Medical Hall' Vs. 'Mohammed Naseer' (2010) SCC OnLine Mad 2196, as
well as in 'Ramu Hosieries' Vs. 'Ramu Hosieries', (1998) SCC OnLine
Mad 452, and came to the conclusion that the trademark is a 'Movable
Property'.
Ramu Hosieries, Re. By Its Sole ... vs Ramu Hosieries, Rep. By Its Partner ... on 6 July, 1998
The Hon'ble
Madras High Court has considered the Judgements passed in 'Shabbir
Medical Hall' Vs. 'Mohammed Naseer' (2010) SCC OnLine Mad 2196, as
well as in 'Ramu Hosieries' Vs. 'Ramu Hosieries', (1998) SCC OnLine
Mad 452, and came to the conclusion that the trademark is a 'Movable
Property'.
M/S Pentex Sales Corporation vs Commissioner Of Sales Tax, Delhi on 6 May, 2013
10. The Hon'ble Apex Court in 'Vikas Sales Corporation' Vs.
'Commissioner of Sales Tax', (199) 4 SCC 433, examined the definition of
'goods' and observed that 'even incorporeal rights like trademarks, copyrights,
are 'Movable Property' and are included in the ambit of definition of 'goods'
under the provisions of Sale of Goods Act, 1930'.