Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.99 seconds)

Nitinbhai Saevantilal Shah & Anr vs Manubhai Manjibhai Panchal & Anr on 1 September, 2011

accused in appeal. The learned Sessions Judge, Amravati, after hearing ::: Uploaded on - 10/11/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 11/11/2017 01:42:11 ::: 711WP630.12-Judgment 11/13 the parties was pleased to set aside the judgment and order of conviction passed by the trial Court and remanded the matter back to the trial Court for de novo trial, in view of the Apex Court judgment in Nitinbhai's case.
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 170 - J M Panchal - Full Document

State Of Madhya Pradesh vs Bhooraji & Ors on 24 August, 2001

Hence the said course can be resorted to when it becomes imperative for the purpose of averting "failure of justice". The superior Court which orders a de novo trial cannot afford to overlook the realities and the serious impact on the pending cases in trial Courts which are crammed with dockets, and how much that order would inflict hardship on many innocent persons who once took all the trouble to reach the Court and deposed their versions in the very same case. The re-enactment of the whole labour might give the impression to the litigant and the common man that law is more pedantic than pragmatic. Law is not an instrument to be used for inflicting sufferings on the people but for the process of justice dispensation [See State of M.P. vs. Bhooraji (2001) 7 SCC 679].
Supreme Court of India Cites 17 - Cited by 148 - Full Document
1   2 Next