Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 65 (0.35 seconds)Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 293 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 45 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 106 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 47 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 73 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Employers Management West Bokaro ... vs Concerned Workman,Ram Pravesh Singh on 1 February, 2008
Case of Meghnath Ram (supra) witnesses cited were
not called and in terms of All India Services (D&A) Rules 1969 penalty
imposed without examination of author of documents. The decisions cited
by the learned counsel for the applicants are of no help. Hon'ble Apex Court
in case Central Board of Dawoodi Bohra Community Versus State of
Maharashtra )2005) 2 SCC 673 held that it is well settled that decision is
authority for which it is decided and not what logically deduced therefrom.
It is well settled that a little difference in facts may make a lot of difference
in the precedential value of a decision.
State Bank Of India And Ors vs Narendra Kumar Pandey on 14 January, 2013
61. During course of the argument Mr. M.P. Dixit Ld. counsel appearing
for the applicants brought to our notice order dated 13.10.2023 passed in OA
No. 330/918 of 2021 Sanjeev Kumar Versus Union of India and others
passed by Ld. Coordinate Bench at Allahabad of this Tribunal. Mr. M.P.
Dixit placed much emphasis whereas case of Sanjeev Kumar (supra) is
distinguishable on facts and law ratio of case to be understood to facts
situation and it is well settled that a little difference in facts may make a lot
of difference in precedential value of the decision.