Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 21 (0.30 seconds)Section 34 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Allen Berry & Co. (P) Ltd vs Union Of India, New Delhi on 5 January, 1971
(ii) In Allen Berry and Co. Pvt. Ltd. v. The Union of India,
1971 (1) SCC 295, the Supreme Court held as under:
Municipal Corporation Of Delhi vs Jagan Nath Ashok Kumar & Anr on 17 September, 1987
(iii) In Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. Jagan Nath Ashok
Kumar, 1987 (4) SCC 497 at 503, the Supreme Court held as
under:
Indian Oil Corporation vs Indian Carbon Ltd on 6 April, 1988
(iv) In Indian Oil Corporation Ltd v. Indian Carbon Ltd, 1988
(3) SCC 36, the Supreme Court held that the jurisdiction to set aside
an award on the ground of an error apparent on the record is not to
be lightly exercised" and observed as under:
Puri Construction Pvt. Ltd. vs Union Of India (Uoi) on 20 January, 1989
(v) In Puri Construction Pvt Ltd. v. Union of lndia, 1989 (1)
SCC 411, the Court held as under:
Sudarsan Trading Co vs Govt. Of Kerala & Anr on 14 February, 1989
(vi) In Sudarshan Trading v. Govt of Kerala, 1989 (2) SCC 38,
the Supreme Court held that a Court has no jurisdiction to examine
the different claims to find out whether in arriving at its decision the
arbitrators acted correctly or incorrectly. The Court cannot evaluate
conclusions of law or fact. It was observed as under:-
State Of Rahjasthan vs Puti Construction Co. Ltd on 16 September, 1994
(vii) In State of Rajasthan v. Puri Construction Co. Ltd., 1994
(6) SCC 485, the court considered extensively the extent to which
Courts would interfere, both on issues of fact and of law. The
Supreme Court held inter alia that the arbitrator is the final arbiter
for the dispute between the parties and it is not open to challenge
the award on the ground that the arbitrator has drawn his own
conclusion or has failed to appreciate the facts. It held that the court
should not reappraise evidence in its anxiety to render justice.
Steel Authority Of India Ltd vs Gupta Brother Steel Tubes Ltd on 9 September, 2009
(viii) In Steel Authority of India Ltd. v. Gupta Brother Steel
Tubes Ltd., (2009) 10 SCC 63, it was held as under:
Swan Gold Mining Ltd vs Hindustan Copper Ltd on 22 September, 2014
(ix) In Swan Gold Mining Ltd. v. Hindustan Copper Ltd., (2015)
5 SCC 739, the Supreme Court held as under: