Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.18 seconds)

Deepti Ahuja vs The Chief Controlling Revenue ... on 20 July, 2016

8.1. The proceeding in Deepti Ahuja case, supra, arose on account of a petition filed by one of the lessees, who intended to take out a residential unit to let it out to the employees of the Special Economic Zone. In that context, the effect of Instruction No.65, dated 27.10.2010 has been examined. The instruction while dealing with the aspects of housing in Special Economic Zone has specified that 5% of the total area should be used for constructing low cost housing and dormitories and that the developer should rent out these houses to the employees of units. The housing facilities could also be used by persons who are working for establishments relating to Special Economic Zone Developers, units and or users of infrastructure facilities created in the Special Economic Zone. The sale of the land per se is barred under the Special Economic Zone Rules, 2006. In the aforesaid context, the perpetual lease deed executed by the private respondents herein in favour of the third parties in the non-processing area of Special Economic Zone came to be examined.
Madras High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 3 - R Subbiah - Full Document
1