Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.24 seconds)Bavajee Fakkir Muhammed And Anr. vs The State Of Kerala And Anr. on 14 September, 1966
I have also come across the
judgment of this Court in 'Muhammed v. State of Kerala &
another' [2013 (1) KLJ 185], wherein also the same
notification was taken into account in the context of challenge
made against the dismissal of application filed seeking
permission to go abroad. Therefore, on a reading of the
judgments rendered by this Court above, the concerned
judgments were basically rendered on peculiar facts involved in
the said cases. Here, in this case, petitioner has not produced
any document before this Court to establish that he has
secured any employment abroad for a specified period to have
a passport with a long duration. Moreover, the learned
Magistrate has not specified any period to travel abroad, or
issued any order restricting issuance of the passport for a
specified period, and in that circumstances, as discussed
above, clause (a)(ii) will come into play, whereby the
respondent is statutorily restricted to issue a passport only for
a period of one year.
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
M.P.Ashok Kumar Aged 57 Years vs State Of Kerala on 28 May, 2015
15. Learned counsel for the petitioner also relied on the
judgment of this Court in 'Ashok Kumar v. State of Kerala'
[2009 (2) KLT 712]. In that case, the very same notification
was under consideration. However, the subject matter of the
case was entirely different and the judgment was rendered by
a learned Single Judge of this Court in the challenge made
against the order passed by the Magistrate, declining
W.P.(C) No.3004 of 2017 11
permission to go abroad.
Section 5 in The Passports Act, 1967 [Entire Act]
Section 6 in The Passports Act, 1967 [Entire Act]
Section 7 in The Passports Act, 1967 [Entire Act]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
1