Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.35 seconds)
Marjia Begum vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors on 19 June, 2012 cites

M.I. Builders Pvt. Ltd vs Radhey Shyam Sahu And Others on 26 July, 1999

Relying on the Comptroller and Auditor General of India & Anr. v. K.S. Jagannathan & Anr., AIR 1987 SC 537, Cantonment Board, Dinapore & Ors. v. Taramani Devi, AIR 1992 SC 61, M.I.Builders Pvt. Ltd. v. Radhey Shyam Sahu & Ors., AIR 1999 SC 2468 and Hindustan Petroleum Corpn. Ltd. v. Darius Shapur Chenai & Ors., AIR 2005 SC 3520, Mr. Chattopadhyay appearing for the petitioner has argued that since the s.6 declaration was made and published without disposing of the petitioner's s.5A objection after giving opportunity of hearing, everything including the s.4 notification is liable to be quashed.
Supreme Court of India Cites 77 - Cited by 432 - D P Wadhwa - Full Document

Comptroller And Auditor General Of ... vs K.S. Jagannathan & Anr on 1 April, 1986

Relying on the Comptroller and Auditor General of India & Anr. v. K.S. Jagannathan & Anr., AIR 1987 SC 537, Cantonment Board, Dinapore & Ors. v. Taramani Devi, AIR 1992 SC 61, M.I.Builders Pvt. Ltd. v. Radhey Shyam Sahu & Ors., AIR 1999 SC 2468 and Hindustan Petroleum Corpn. Ltd. v. Darius Shapur Chenai & Ors., AIR 2005 SC 3520, Mr. Chattopadhyay appearing for the petitioner has argued that since the s.6 declaration was made and published without disposing of the petitioner's s.5A objection after giving opportunity of hearing, everything including the s.4 notification is liable to be quashed.
Supreme Court of India Cites 15 - Cited by 475 - D P Madon - Full Document

Hindustan Petroleum Corpn. Ltd vs Darius Shapur Chenai & Ors on 20 September, 2005

Relying on the Comptroller and Auditor General of India & Anr. v. K.S. Jagannathan & Anr., AIR 1987 SC 537, Cantonment Board, Dinapore & Ors. v. Taramani Devi, AIR 1992 SC 61, M.I.Builders Pvt. Ltd. v. Radhey Shyam Sahu & Ors., AIR 1999 SC 2468 and Hindustan Petroleum Corpn. Ltd. v. Darius Shapur Chenai & Ors., AIR 2005 SC 3520, Mr. Chattopadhyay appearing for the petitioner has argued that since the s.6 declaration was made and published without disposing of the petitioner's s.5A objection after giving opportunity of hearing, everything including the s.4 notification is liable to be quashed.
Supreme Court of India Cites 36 - Cited by 542 - S B Sinha - Full Document

Cantonment Board, Dinapore And Others vs Taramani Devi on 17 September, 1991

Relying on the Comptroller and Auditor General of India & Anr. v. K.S. Jagannathan & Anr., AIR 1987 SC 537, Cantonment Board, Dinapore & Ors. v. Taramani Devi, AIR 1992 SC 61, M.I.Builders Pvt. Ltd. v. Radhey Shyam Sahu & Ors., AIR 1999 SC 2468 and Hindustan Petroleum Corpn. Ltd. v. Darius Shapur Chenai & Ors., AIR 2005 SC 3520, Mr. Chattopadhyay appearing for the petitioner has argued that since the s.6 declaration was made and published without disposing of the petitioner's s.5A objection after giving opportunity of hearing, everything including the s.4 notification is liable to be quashed.
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 14 - Full Document
1