Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.17 seconds)Section 114 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Gulla Kharagjit Carpenter vs Narsingh Nandkishore Rawat on 27 October, 1969
The Madhya Pradesh High Court in Gulla Kharagjit Carpenter v. Narsingh Nandkishore Rawat, , also followed the Privy Council decision in Sardar Gurbakhsh Singh's case AIR 1927 PC 230 (supra).
Arjun Singh vs Virendra Nath And Anr. on 2 January, 1970
The Allahabad High Court in Arjun Singh v. Virender Nath, held that if a party abstains from entering the witness box, it would give rise to an inference adverse against him.
Bhagwan Dass vs Bhishan Chand And Ors. on 24 July, 1972
Similarly, a Division Bench of the Punjab and Harayana High Court in Bhagwan Dass v. Bhishan Chand, AIR 1974 Punj and Har 7, drew a presumption under Section 114 of the Evidence Act against a party who did not enter into the witness box.
Martand Pandharinath Chaudhari vs Radhabai Krishnarao Deshmukh on 24 March, 1930
This was followed by the Lahore High Court in Kirpa Singh v. Ajaipal Singh, AIR 1930 Lahore 1 and the Bombay High Court in Martand Pandharinath Chaudhari v. Radhabai Krishnarao Deshmukh, AIR 1931 Bombay 97.
Section 17 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 21 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 58 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Sardar Gurbaksh Singh vs Gurdial Singh on 19 July, 1927
The Madhya Pradesh High Court in Gulla Kharagjit Carpenter v. Narsingh Nandkishore Rawat, , also followed the Privy Council decision in Sardar Gurbakhsh Singh's case AIR 1927 PC 230 (supra).
1