Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.25 seconds)Section 209 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 407 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Ajay Singh And Anr And Etc vs State Of Chhattisgarh And Anr on 6 January, 2017
In support of this contention, learned
counsel for the petitioners relied upon a decision Ajay Singh and
Another v. State of Chhattisgarh and another4, wherein the Hon'ble
Supreme Court observed that Article 227 of the Constitution of India
confers power of superintendence on the High Court over the Courts
and tribunals within the territory of the State. The High Court has the
4
2017 (3) SCC 330
5
jurisdiction and the authority to exercise suo motu power. In the said
case it was held that the High Court on the administrative side had
transferred the case to the learned Sessions Judge by which it has
conferred jurisdiction on the trial Court which has the jurisdiction to
try the Sessions Case under Cr.P.C. and found no illegality in
transferring the same.
Himanshu Singh Sabharwal vs State Of M.P. And Ors on 12 March, 2008
10. He also relied on another decision in Himanshu Singh Sabharwal
v. State of Madhya Pradesh and Others5, wherein transfer of case
was sought when recall of witnesses was warranted. The Hon'ble
Supreme Court has allowed the transfer petition holding that the trial
shall commence from the stage it was when the order of stay was
passed by the Court.
Nathu Lal & Others vs State Of U.P. on 18 May, 2018
In support of his contention he relies on the decision of the
Hon'ble Supreme Court in Nathi Lal and Others v. State of U.P. and
another1 wherein it was held that in cross cases, each case has to be
decided on the basis of evidence placed on record in that particular
case without being influenced by the evidence or arguments urged in
cross case and Judgments should be pronounced by the same Judge
one after the other.
Section 323 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
State Of M.P vs Mishrilal (Dead) & Ors. @ on 2 April, 2003
He also placed reliance on a decision in State of
M.P. v. Mishrilal (Dead) and Others2 which stands on similar
footing.
Sudhir & Ors. Etc. vs State Of M.P. Etc. on 2 February, 2001
In another decision in Sudhir and Others v. State of M.P.3 it
was held as under:
1