Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 42 (0.46 seconds)Section 489C in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 28 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 489D in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 489A in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 28 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 106 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
M. Mammutti vs State Of Karnataka on 15 February, 1979
On the
date of the incident the appellant was said to be an eighteen-year-old
student. On the facts of this case the presumption drawn by the trial court is
not warranted under Section 4 of the Evidence Act. Further it is also not
shown that any specific question with regard to the currency notes being
fake or counterfeit was put to the appellant in his examination under Section
Signature Not Verified 313 of the Criminal Procedure Code. On these facts, we have no option but
Digitally Signed
By:KAMAL KUMAR CRL.A. 117/2022 & 141/2022 Page 11 of 25
Signing Date:01.05.2024
23:50:37
to hold that the charges framed under Sections 489-B and 489-C are not
proved. We, therefore, set aside the conviction and sentence passed on the
appellant under Sections 489-B and 489-C IPC and acquit him of the said
charges (see: M. Mammutti v. State of Karnataka [(1979) 4 SCC 723 : 1980
SCC (Cri) 170 : AIR 1979 SC 1705] )."