Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 17 (0.25 seconds)Section 150 in The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Section 148 in The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Section 147 in The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Section 149 in The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
The Income Tax Act, 1961
Sukhdayal Pahwa vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax on 4 December, 1981
The decision of the M. P. High Court in the case of Sukhdayal Pahwa (supra) also took the same view as was taken by the Hon'ble A. P. High Court and Bombay High Court in the abovementioned decisions in B. A. R. Abdul Rahman Saheb's case (supra) and Ambaji Traders (P.)
Calcutta Discount Company Limited vs Income-Tax Officer, Companies ... on 1 November, 1960
Ltd. v. ITO [1976] 105 ITR 273 (Bom.
B.A.R. Abdul Rahman Saheb vs Income-Tax Officer, A-Ward And Anr. on 22 October, 1971
The decision of the M. P. High Court in the case of Sukhdayal Pahwa (supra) also took the same view as was taken by the Hon'ble A. P. High Court and Bombay High Court in the abovementioned decisions in B. A. R. Abdul Rahman Saheb's case (supra) and Ambaji Traders (P.)
Consolidated Coffee Ltd. vs Income-Tax Officer on 30 May, 1983
In contrast with the abovementioned facts which prevailed in the case of Consolidated Coffee Ltd. (supra), the facts in the present case are that an absolutely necessary finding had been given by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal in paragraph 5 of its order dated 27-10-1982. The Karnataka High Court decision relied upon by the learned authorised counsel of the assessee, therefore, does not go against the findings that we have given.