Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 25 (0.66 seconds)Section 369 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 482 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
State Of Orissa vs Ram Chander Agarwala Etc on 5 October, 1978
42. Of recent times State of Rajasthan v. Gurcharandas Chadha, relied on the decision of State of Orissa v. Ram Chandra Aggarwal (supra) and reiterated the position with regard to the bar of review of an Order.
Section 362 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
U.J.S. Chopra vs State Of Bombay on 25 March, 1955
His Lordship was dealing with a provision of Section 369 of the Code (Section 362 of the new Code) and had taken into account the ratio of the 3-Judge Bench decision of the Supreme Court in U. J. S. Chopra (supra).
Bindeshwari Prasad Singh vs Kali Singh on 28 July, 1975
In this context it would be of abiding interest to take note of the decision of Bindeshwari Prasad Singh v. Kali Singh, , where the Supreme Court held that the power of recalling of cases disposed of by judicial Order not possible for any Magistrate as it did not have any power to review or recall an Order as the inherent powers under Section 561A (read Section 482 of the New Code) is only vested with the High Court. In the hew Code Section 362 debars even the High Court to override Section 362 by way of invoking the provisions of Section 482 exercising this inherent power.
Sankatha Singh vs State Of U.P on 25 January, 1962
41. Even the Supreme Court while dealing with the provisions of the old Code (Section 369) in Sankatha Singh and Ors. v. State of Uttar Pradesh : , in a 3-Judge Bench decision consisting of S. K. Das, K. Subba Rao (as the learned Chief Justice of India then was) and Raghubar Dayal, JJ. held Section 369 (read Section 362 of the New Code) read with Section 424 (read Section 387 of the new Code) makes it clear that the Appellate Court is not to alter or review the judgment once signed; except for the purpose of correction of a clerical error.
State Of Rajasthan vs Gurcharandas Chadha on 6 April, 1979
42. Of recent times State of Rajasthan v. Gurcharandas Chadha, relied on the decision of State of Orissa v. Ram Chandra Aggarwal (supra) and reiterated the position with regard to the bar of review of an Order.
R. Annapurna vs Ramadugu Anantha Krishna Sastry And ... on 9 August, 2000
In R. Annapurna v. Ramadugu Anantha Krishna Sastry and Ors., 2004 SCC (Cri) 1135 the Supreme Court has found the High Court has no power to recall or review its own Order.