Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 23 (0.24 seconds)United Bank Of India vs Sh. Naresh Kumar And Ors on 18 September, 1996
However,
learned counsel for the defendant has contended that
decision of United Bank of India vs. Naresh Kumar and
Others (supra) is not applicable to the facts of the present
case as that case was a suit for recovery filed by a
Suit No. 12/08/01 16
nationalized bank involving public money and the said case
was relating only to the competence of the person signing
the plaint but in the present suit, the dispute is also as to
whether the suit has been instituted by duly authorised
person or not.
Rajghria Paper Mills Ltd. vs The General Manager, Indian Security ... on 31 January, 2000
In view of aforesaid decision in M/s Rajghria Paper Mills
Ltd. v. General Manager, Indian Security Press and
another (supra), the reliance as placed by learned counsel
for plaintiff on the devision of United Bank of India vs.
Naresh Kumar and Others (supra) is of no help to the
plaintiff.
Section 33 in The Companies Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Section 28 in The Companies Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
The Companies Act, 1956
Dhariwal Industries Ltd. & Anr vs M/S M.S.S. Food Products on 25 February, 2005
In the circumstances, in
view of decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in case Dhariwal
Industries Ltd. & Anr. v. M.S.S. Food Products (supra)
the plea of the plaintiff that the defendants have violated the
plaintiff's trade mark by using REVOX has no force. This
issue is accordingly decided in favour of the defendants and
against the plaintiff.
Section 12 in The Trade Marks Act, 1999 [Entire Act]
Section 31 in The Companies Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Ramdev Food Products Pvt. Ltd vs Arvindbhai Rambhai Patel & Ors on 29 August, 2006
15. The Supreme Court in Ramdev Food Products
(P) Ltd. v. Arvindbhal Rambhal Patel
MANU/SC/3725/2006 : 2006 (33)PTC281(SC) has
held as follows: