Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.23 seconds)Section 4 in The Karnataka Regulation of Stone Crushers Act, 2011 [Entire Act]
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 15 in The Karnataka Regulation of Stone Crushers Act, 2011 [Entire Act]
Commr.Of Income Tax-I,New Delhi vs Vatika Township P.Ltd on 15 September, 2014
11. Another submission is that if the said Act of
2011 which is amended with effect from 26th December
2013 is applied to the application for renewal, it will amount
to retrospectively operating the said law, though there is no
indication that the amended provision has a retrospective
effect. The sum and substance of the contention is that
once the licence is granted for a period of five years, the
renewal is automatic as a matter of right. As held earlier,
the application for renewal of licence is on par with a fresh
application for grant of licence. Such an application has to
be dealt with according to the law prevailing on the date of
making the application for renewal. Therefore, it is
impossible to accept the submission that the Act which is
amended with effect from 26th December 2013 is being
retrospectively applied to the application for renewal and
therefore, the said argument deserves to be rejected and
the law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Vatika
Township Private Limited (supra) is not applicable.
The Karnataka Regulation of Stone Crushers Act, 2011
Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 3 in The Karnataka Regulation of Stone Crushers Act, 2011 [Entire Act]
1