cites: 72699030

Shankar Sonu Kotgir And Other vs Shaikh Ramjan Shaikh Imaam And Other on 31 August, 2018

MACT No. 785/22, Sapna & Ors. Vs. Ramjan & Anr. Date of Award 09.04.2025 MACT No. 217/23, Sonu Vs. Ramjan & Anr. Page No. 20 of 37 He denied that he had not taken any treatment from any private doctor and that is why, he had not placed any such document on record.

Bombay High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - S P Deshmukh - Full Document

The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988

Union of India - Act Cites 0 - Cited by 94259

The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908

Union of India - Act Cites 0 - Cited by 497050

Section 2 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 2545

Section 133 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 5440

Section 161 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 93909

Section 173 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 37168

Bimla Devi & Ors vs Himachal Road Transport Corpn. & Ors on 15 April, 2009

No. 550/2011 decided on 02.07.2012, Bimla Devi & Others v. Himachal Road Transport Corporation & Others (2009) 13 SC 530, Parmeshwari v. Amirchand & Others SACHIN Digitally signed by SACHIN GUPTA GUPTA Date: 2025.04.09 17:29:52 +0530 MACT No. 785/22, Sapna & Ors. Vs. Ramjan & Anr. Date of Award 09.04.2025 MACT No. 217/23, Sonu Vs. Ramjan & Anr. Page No. 7 of 37 2011 (1) SCR 1096 & Mangla Ram v. Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. & Others 2018, Law Suit (SC) 303.

Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 2658 - S B Sinha - Full Document

National Insurance Company Ltd vs Pranay Sethi And Others on 22 June, 2022

In case of Pranay Sethi (Supra), it has been held that reasonable figures on conventional heads, namely, loss of estate, loss of consortium and funeral expenses should be Rs. 15,000/-, Rs. 40,000/- and Rs. 15,000/- respectively and the aforesaid amounts should be enhanced at the rate of 10% in every three years. Therefore, a compensation of Rs. 48,000/-, Rs. 18,000/- and Rs.18,000/- respectively on account of loss of consortium, loss of estate and funeral expenses is required to be granted.

Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 1946 - J R Dua - Full Document

Bajaj Allianz General Insurance ... vs Pooja & Ors. on 2 November, 2017

30. On the day of accident, deceased was aged about 29 years 4 months. Having considered the facts and circumstances SACHIN Digitally signed by SACHIN GUPTA GUPTA 17:31:35 +0530 Date: 2025.04.09 MACT No. 785/22, Sapna & Ors. Vs. Ramjan & Anr. Date of Award 09.04.2025 MACT No. 217/23, Sonu Vs. Ramjan & Anr. Page No. 17 of 37 of the present matter, future prospects @ 40% has to be awarded in favour of petitioners in view of pronouncement made by the Apex Court in the case titled as "National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Pranay Sethi & Ors." Civil Appeal No. 6961/2015 decided on 31.10.2017, as well as in view of decision of Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in appeal bearing MAC APP No. 798/2011 titled as "Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Pooja & Ors", decided on 02.11.17.

Delhi High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 412 - R K Gauba - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results