cites: 72861147

P.K. Govindan Nairand Ors. vs P. Narayanan Nair And Ors. on 17 October, 1912

In the decision reported in Govindan Nair v. Narayanan Nair (1956 Tra.Co 266), this Court had occasion to observe the circumstance when the plea of constructive res judicata can be got over.

Madras High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 6 - Full Document

State Of Karnataka & Anr vs All India Manufacturers Organization & ... on 20 April, 2006

Combining all these principles, a Constitution Bench of this Court in Direct Recruit, Class II Engineering Officers' Association v. State of Maharashtra16expounded on the principle laid down in Forward Construction Co. (supra) by holding that : ".......an adjudication is conclusive and final not only as to the actual matter determined but as to every other matter which the parties might and ought to have litigated and have had (sic) decided as incidental to or essentially connected with (sic) subject matter of the RSA.883/2003.

Supreme Court of India Cites 28 - Cited by 245 - Full Document

Ishwar Dutt vs Land Acquisition Collector And Anr on 2 August, 2005

21. As regards the issue of estoppel, in the decision reported in Ishwar Dutt v. Land Acquisition Collector ((2005) 7 SCC 190), it was held as follows:

Supreme Court of India Cites 22 - Cited by 206 - Full Document

Section 11 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 6470

Dadu Dayalu Mahasabha, Jaipur (Trust) vs Mahant Ram Niwas & Anr on 12 May, 2008

In the decision reported in Dadu Dayalu Mahasabha, Jaipur (Trust) v. Mahant Ram Niwas ((2008) 11 SCC 753) construing Section 22 and Order 2 Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the court observed as follows:

Supreme Court of India Cites 14 - Cited by 98 - S B Sinha - Full Document

State Of Uttar Pradesh vs Nawab Hussain on 4 April, 1977

38. The judgment in Greenhalgh (supra) was approvingly referred to by this Court in State of U.P. v. Nawab Hussain15.

Supreme Court of India Cites 13 - Cited by 196 - P N Shinghal - Full Document

Sulochana Amma vs Narayanan Nair on 24 September, 1993

In the decision reported in Sulochana Amma v. Narayanan Nair (AIR 1994 SC 152), the court had observed as follows:

Supreme Court of India Cites 13 - Cited by 183 - K Ramaswamy - Full Document

S. Venkatesha Bhatta vs S. Subramanya Bhatta And Ors. on 11 January, 1972

In the decision reported in S. Venkatesha Bhatta v. S.Subrammanya Bhatta (1972 K.L.T. 215) the question as to whether the decision on each of the points operates as res judicata was considered and it was held as follows:

Kerala High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 2 - Full Document

The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908

Union of India - Act Cites 0 - Cited by 497050

In Re: Kelly And Henderson P. Ltd., L. Jai ... vs Kelly And Henderson Pvt. Ltd. on 19 March, 1979

"36. The spirit behind Explanation IV is brought out in the pithy words of Wigram, V.C. in Henderson v. Henderson11as follows:

Bombay High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 40 - S V Manohar - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results

Section 11 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]