Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.37 seconds)
Yatindra Kumar Jha & Ors vs Smt.Ravindra Prabha Ojhain @Sh on 2 August, 2017 cites

Savita Devi vs District Judge, Gorakhpur And Others on 18 February, 1999

6. So far as purchase made in violation of injunction order is concerned, in Savitri Devi vs. District judge, Gorakhpur and ors (Supra) the Apex Court has held that the impleadment is necessary for deciding the Patna High Court FA No.236 of 1997 (42) dt.02-08-2017 questions whether sales were committed in contempt and disregard of injunction and whether purchasers were bona fide transferees and further to avoid multiplicity of the suits, the party can be added. Without presence of Navin Kumar Singh all the issues cannot be decided and as such for effective adjudication Navin Kumar Singh appears necessary to be added in this appeal as respondent no. 1. Due to adding of party no right and title can pass over the party and his right and title can be decided in the appeal itself.
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 206 - Full Document

Baluram vs P.Chellathangam & Ors on 10 December, 2014

Further reliance has been placed upon a judgment reported in AIR 2015 Supreme Court 1264 in the matter of Baluram v. P. Cheelathangam and others. It is argued that after such a long delay intervener cannot be added as a party. The first sale deed is of the year 1988 and as such the petition of the intervener filed in the year 2009 after such a long lapse of time cannot be entertained.
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 42 - A K Goel - Full Document

Sk. Riyasat Ali vs Sk. Safiuddin Ahamed & Ors on 25 June, 2015

6. So far as purchase made in violation of injunction order is concerned, in Savitri Devi vs. District judge, Gorakhpur and ors (Supra) the Apex Court has held that the impleadment is necessary for deciding the Patna High Court FA No.236 of 1997 (42) dt.02-08-2017 questions whether sales were committed in contempt and disregard of injunction and whether purchasers were bona fide transferees and further to avoid multiplicity of the suits, the party can be added. Without presence of Navin Kumar Singh all the issues cannot be decided and as such for effective adjudication Navin Kumar Singh appears necessary to be added in this appeal as respondent no. 1. Due to adding of party no right and title can pass over the party and his right and title can be decided in the appeal itself.
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 1 - Cited by 4 - J Bhattacharya - Full Document
1