Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.34 seconds)Karnataka Rent Act, 1999
Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Sunil Kr. Bose vs Jagabandhu Dhang on 20 June, 2003
In support of his submissions, he has relied
upon two decisions in the case of Sunil Kr.bose v.
Jagabandhu Dhang (AIR 2004 Calcutta 13) and
Mrs.Yashoda Raju vs. A.Kuselan (AIR 2004
Madras 106).
Section 116 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 105 in The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882 [Entire Act]
Popular Automobiles vs N. Veeraswamy on 7 October, 1988
10. A perusal of said judgment would indicate
that though there was a sale of property by the
earlier landlady, yet she continued to receive the rent
and the rent receipts was issued by her even as on the
date of filing of Eviction petition and same came to be
produced. This fact had swayed in the mind of the co-
ordinate bench to accept the plea of the respondent
therein to arrive at a conclusion there was no
attornment of tenancy. However, the law on this aspect
namely with regard to Attornment of tenancy, where a
registered sale deed is executed by the owner of the
property in favour of the purchaser, has been laid down
by this Court reported in the matter of M/s.Popular
Automobiles vs. N.Veeraswamy (ILR 1989 KAR 1555),
wherein, it has been clearly held that there is statutory
10
attornment when there is a registered sale deed and
as such, the defendant in the instant case cannot be
heard to contend that there is no attornment of
tenancy. The said contention raised by Sri.G.K.Bhat
stands rejected.
Mrs. Yashoda Raju vs A. Kuselan on 18 November, 2003
In support of his submissions, he has relied
upon two decisions in the case of Sunil Kr.bose v.
Jagabandhu Dhang (AIR 2004 Calcutta 13) and
Mrs.Yashoda Raju vs. A.Kuselan (AIR 2004
Madras 106).
1