Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.19 seconds)Minor D. Shanmuga Raja, Zamindar Of ... vs Raja Sir S.R.M.M.A. Annamalai Chettiar ... on 19 April, 1945
But if not so far advanced as to be substantially
complete, it must be rejected [Diwan v. R, A 1933 L 561].
Section 376 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 511 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 138 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 161 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 164 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Food Inspector vs James N.T. And Anr. on 10 November, 1997
The evidence of a witness who could not be subjected to cross-
examination due to his death before he could be cross-examined, is
admissible in evidence, though the evidentiary value will depend upon
the facts and circumstances of case. [Food Inspector v. James N.T:
1998 Cri LJ 3494, 3497 (Ker)]. If the examination is substantially
Crl. Appeal Nos.1419/2013 & 1232/2014 Page 13 of 15
complete and the witness is prevented by death, sickness or other causes
(mentioned in s 33) from finishing his testimony, it ought not to be
rejected entirely.
Section 428 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
1