Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 16 (0.33 seconds)Section 7Q in Employees Provident Funds Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 [Entire Act]
Section 7A in Employees Provident Funds Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 [Entire Act]
Section 14B in Employees Provident Funds Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 [Entire Act]
M/S Net 4 India Ltd. vs Union Of India And Anr. on 2 August, 2016
In fact, the ld. Division Bench of this Court in M/s Net 4 India
Limited vs. Union of India & Anr. [W.P.(C) 6673/2016, decided on 2nd
August, 2016] clearly holds that when interest under Section 7Q is included
in an order passed under Section 14B, the same could be appealed under
Section 7I. The relevant observation of the ld. Division Bench is set out
below:
Section 11 in The Employees' Provident Funds Scheme, 1952 [Entire Act]
Maharashtra State Co-Operative Bank ... vs Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax on 12 August, 1998
"12. This court in Maharashtra State Cooperative
Bank Limited v. Assistant provident Fund
Commissioner and others while interpreting the
expression "any amount due from an employer"
The Regional Provident Fund ... vs Vivekananda Vidyamandir on 28 February, 2019
6. The submission of Ms. Shruti Munjal, ld. counsel is that the order
imposing interest ought to be stayed in view of the fact that damages under
Section 14B have already been imposed and the judgment in Vivekanada
Vidyamandir (supra) was rendered by the Supreme Court only in February,
2019, which lead to the passing of the assessment order dated 24th April,
2019. Thus, interest ought not to be levied in the present case.
Shri. Lhousakhotuo Vimero vs The State Of Nagaland & Ors on 24 April, 2017
He also relies upon the judgment of the Guahati High Court in
W.P. No. 30(K) of 2016 titled Shri Lhousakhotuo Vimero v. The State of
Nagaland & Ors. where the High Court has held that if a Tribunal lacks
inherent jurisdiction, it cannot be bestowed with jurisdiction by any other
mechanism.