Arun Prakash Yadav vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh Thr on 31 March, 2016
I am bound by Division Bench judgment
passed by this Court in Arun Prakash Yadav (supra). As per Rule 9 of the
C.C.A. Rules, the Appointing Authority is competent to place the petitioner
under suspension. The petitioner is admittedly appointed by the respondent
No.2. For this reason also, I am unable to hold that the petitioner was
placed under suspension by an incompetent authority. This is also trite that
singular different fact may change the precedential value of a judgment.