Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 22 (0.23 seconds)
State Of U.P. vs Subhash Chandra Jaiswal on 29 November, 2016 cites

Shri Prakash Dwivedi Son Of Sri Raj ... vs State Of U.P. Through Secretary, ... on 10 April, 2007

7. Noting the statement of the SSP, the High Court observed that it depicts a very sorry state of affairs of maintenance of law and order in the State and paints a grim picture in which State is functioning, ignoring one of the most important aspects of administration, i.e., public safety, security and maintenance of law and order. It referred to the order dated 14.10.2011 passed in Writ-C No. 40344 of 2011 titled Raj Prakash v. State of U.P. and others, reproduced few passages from it and thereafter stated thus:-
Allahabad High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 37 - Full Document

Union Of India And Anr vs Deoki Nandan Aggarwal on 4 September, 1991

In Union of India and another v. Deoki Nandan Ag- garwal6 a three-Judge Bench has observed that the power to legislate has not been conferred on the courts and, therefore, the court cannot add words to a statute or read words into it which are not there. 5 Frankfurter, Felix in Clark, Tom C., “Mr Justice Frankfurter: ‘A Heritage for all Who Love the Law’”, 51 ABAJ 330, p. 332 (1965) 6 1992 Supp (1) SCC 323
Supreme Court of India Cites 18 - Cited by 430 - Full Document

Vemareddy Kumaraswamy Reddy & Anr vs State Of A.P on 13 February, 2006

In Vemareddy Kumaraswamy Reddy and another v. State of A.P.7 the Court observed that the judges should not proclaim that they are playing the role of a law-maker merely for an exhibition of ju- dicial valour. They have to remember that there is a line, though thin, which separates adjudication from legislation. That line should not be crossed or erased.
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 155 - A Pasayat - Full Document

Suresh Seth vs Commissioner, Indore Municipal ... on 6 October, 2005

In this context, we may fruitfully refer to the authority in Suresh Seth v. Commr., Indore Municipal Corporation and oth- ers8 wherein it has been held that the Court cannot issue any direc- tion to the legislature to make any particular kind of enactment be- cause under the constitutional scheme, Parliament and Legislative As- semblies exercise sovereign power to enact laws and no outside power or authority can issue a direction to enact a particular piece of legisla- tion.
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 67 - G P Mathur - Full Document

Supreme Court Employees' Welfare ... vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Anr. on 24 July, 1989

In Supreme Court Employees’ Welfare Association v. Union of India and another9 it has been ruled that no court can direct a legislature to enact a particular law. Similarly, when an executive au- thority exercises a legislative power by way of a subordinate legislation pursuant to the delegated authority of a legislature, such executive authority cannot be asked to enact a law which it has been empow- ered to do under the delegated legislative authority.
Supreme Court of India Cites 49 - Cited by 588 - M M Dutt - Full Document
1   2 3 Next