Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 26 (3.06 seconds)
M/S S M Enterprises And Anr vs Modi Mundi Pharma Beauty Products Pvt. ... on 6 August, 2025 cites

Delhi Airport Metro Express Pvt. Ltd. vs Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd. on 9 September, 2021

28. As to what amounts to patent illegality, is no longer res integra the Hon'ble Supreme Court in its recent judgment pronounced in a case titled and reported as Delhi Airport Metro Express Pvt. Ltd. v. Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd, (2022) 1 SCC 131, observed as to what amounts to patent illegality. In para 29 of its judgment, the following dicta has been laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court :-
Supreme Court of India Cites 27 - Cited by 282 - L N Rao - Full Document

Gayatri Balasamy vs M/S Isg Novasoft Technologies Limited on 19 October, 2023

Even otherwise, in a recent judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court pronounced in the case titled and reported as Gayatri Baleswamy v. ISG Novasoft Technologies Ltd., (2025) INSC 605, it has been held that a Court under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act does have an authority to modify an award, particularly when such a denial would OMP (Comm) No. 82/23 M/S S.M. Enterprises & Anr. Vs. Modi Mundi Pharma Beauty Products Pvt. Ltd. Page 42 of 43 ANU Digitally signed by ANU GROVER GROVER BALIGA Date: 2025.08.08 BALIGA 12:15:45 +0530 impose significant hardships, escalate costs, and lead to unnecessary delays and would defeat the raison d'etre of arbitration. It has also been categorically held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court that judicial intervention is legitimate and necessary when it furthers the ends of justice, including the resolution of disputes.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 6 - Full Document

Gateway Impex Pvt. Ltd. vs Tata Aig Life Insurance Co. Ltd. on 23 September, 2019

40. Ld. Counsels for Respondent have however vehemently contended that this Court must not interfere with the award of the damages granted by the Ld. Arbitrator in favour of the Respondent. They have submitted that the Ld. Arbitrator has awarded damages in favour of the Respondent after interalia, taking into account the future profit that would been earned by the Respondent had the shop not been in unauthorised possession of the Petitioner and in doing so he has not committed any illegality whatsoever. They have, in this respect, again relied upon the judgment of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in M/s Crest Education (P) Ltd.case(Supra) They have pointed out that in the said judgment the Hon'ble Delhi High Court has reiterated the settled position of law namely that there cannot be a direct and concrete evidence of loss of profit suffered by the parties.
Delhi High Court Cites 28 - Cited by 0 - J Singh - Full Document
1   2 3 Next