Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 15 (0.44 seconds)Section 107 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 109 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Sanju @ Sanjay Singh Sengar vs State Of M.P on 1 May, 2002
In Sanju alias Sanjay Singh Sengar vs. State of MP, (2002) 5 SCC
371, the Hon'ble Apex Court in paragraphs 9 to 11 has observed as under:-
Ramesh Kumar vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 17 October, 2001
No doubt that
the word "instigate" used in Section 107 IPC has been
explained by this Court in Ramesh Kumar v. State of
Chhattisgarh ((2001) 9 SCC 618) to say that where the
accused had, by his acts or omissions or by a continued
course of conduct, created such circumstances that the
deceased was left with no other option except to commit
suicide, an instigation may have to be inferred. In other
words, instigation has to be gathered from the
circumstances of the case. All cases may not be of direct
evidence in regard to instigation having a direct nexus to the
suicide. There could be cases where the circumstances
created by the accused are such that a person feels totally
frustrated and finds it difficult to continue existence.''
Section 482 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Amalendu Pal @ Jhantu vs State Of West Bengal on 11 November, 2009
In Amalendu Pal @ Jhantu vs. State of West Bengal reported in
(2010) 1 SCC 707, the Supreme Court has held as under:-
Mahendra Singh And Anr., Gayatribai vs State Of M.P. on 7 February, 1995
10. This Court, considering the definition of 'abetment' under
section 107 I.P.C., found that the charge and conviction of the
appellant for an offence under section 306 is not sustainable
merely on the allegation of harassment to the deceased. This
Court further held that neither of the ingredients of abetment
are attracted on the statement of the deceased.