Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.54 seconds)The Right to Information Act, 2005
H.P.Public Service Commission vs Mukesh Thakur & Anr on 25 May, 2010
19. While on this issue, it is relevant to refer to the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of H.P.Public Service Commission vs. Mukesh Thakur, reported in 2010-5-MLJ-746 (SC) (which was relied upon by the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court in the case of Jagadiswaran), the Hon'ble Supreme Court held that it was not permissible for the High Court to examine the question paper and the answer sheets.
Maharashtra State Board Of Secondary ... vs Paritosh Bhupesh Kumar Sheth Etc on 17 July, 1984
18.The decision in H.P.Public Service Commission itself followed the law laid down in Maharashtra State Board of Secondary and Higher Secondary Education vs. Paritosh Bhupesh Kumarsheth and the decision in Pramod Kumar Srivastava. Therefore, we are of the view that the law is clinched in paragraph 19 of the decision of the Supreme Court in H.P.Public Service Commission. It will be useful to extract the said paragraph as follows: "19.In view of the above, it was not permissible for the High Court to examine the question paper and answer sheets itself, particularly, when the Commission had assessed the inter-se merit of the candidates. If there was a discrepancy in framing the question or evaluation of the answer, it could be for all the candidates appearing for the examination and not for respondent no.1 only. It is a matter of chance that the High Court was examining the answer sheets relating to law. Had it been other subjects like physics, chemistry and mathematics, we are unable to understand as to whether such a course could have been adopted by the High Court."
1