Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 34 (0.69 seconds)

Bhoolchand And Anr vs Kay Pee Cee Investments And Anr on 10 October, 1990

In Bhoolchand case (10 supra) also, the Apex Court held that revision provided under Section 50 of the Karnataka Rent Control Act, 1961 cannot be equated with the power of the appellate Court under Section 107(2) of CPC and that the revisional power under Section 50 of the said Act even though wide as indicated must fall short of the appellate court's power of interference with a finding of fact.
Supreme Court of India Cites 17 - Cited by 20 - J S Verma - Full Document

Sri. Raja Lakshmi Dyeing Works And Ors. vs Rangaswamy Chettiar on 26 March, 1980

In Speedline Agencies case (12 supra) and in M/s. Sri Raja Lakshmi Dyeing Works case (14 supra) also, the Supreme Court held that the power conferred on the High Court under Section 25 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act may not be as narrow as the revisional power of the High Court under Section 115 of CPC, but it is not wide enough to make the High Court a second court of first appeal.
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 134 - O C Reddy - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next