Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.24 seconds)
Amarkant Rao And Another vs Union Of India And Others on 2 July, 2010 cites

State Bank Of India & Ors. .... ... vs Aspal Kaur ...Respondent(S) on 1 February, 2007

In view of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in State Bank of India and others vs. Jaspal Kaur (supra), this Court is of the opinion that the case of the petitioners have not been considered properly by the respondents/Railways under the scheme/policy, which was in vogue when they moved their respective applications. The order deciding their representations as well as the order passed by the Tribunal thus need to be interfered with, the same deserve to be and are hereby quashed.
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 362 - A R Lakshmanan - Full Document

Kunal Singh vs Union Of India & Anr on 13 February, 2003

The respondents/Railways shall now consider the applications moved by each of the petitioners for grant of appointment on compassionate ground to their wards on the basis of scheme/policy applicable on the date when the applications were moved for the first time and also keeping in view the provisions of the Act, 1995 and the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Kunal Singh vs. Union of India and another (supra), which weighed with the Railway Board for issuance of instructions on 29-4- 1999, 18-1-2000, 10-11-2000, 4-3-2002, 6-3-2002 and 26-6- 2002.
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 344 - S V Patil - Full Document
1