Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.24 seconds)

United Phosphorus Ltd. vs Union Of India & Another on 14 July, 2009

With regard to the first issue of rejecting the refund claim as being time-barred, he submitted that the date of submitting the refund claim initially was 06.01.2017. The claim was returned for rectifying the defects and, therefore, the date of re-submission cannot be reckoned as the date for computing the period of limitation. To support the arguments, he relied upon the decision of the Hon'ble Gujarat High Court in the case of M/s.United Phosphorus Ltd. Vs Union of India reported in 2005 (184) E.L.T.240 (Guj.). Alternatively, the learned counsel argued that service tax was paid under mistake and, therefore, the time-limit prescribed under section 11B will not apply. The appellant had paid service tax on services that is not taxable / exempted from payment of service tax. Thus when service tax is paid 3 ST/40226/2019 under mistake, the time-limit prescribed under the law cannot be pressed into application for rejecting the refund claim.
Delhi High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 8 - S Khanna - Full Document
1