Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 13 (0.29 seconds)Satish Kumar Sharma vs Delhi Administration And Ors. on 11 November, 1990
16. In Capt. Satish Kumar Sharma's case (1991 Cri LJ 1950) (supra), it was held that the Delhi High Court had jurisdiction to grant pre-arrest bail to Captain Satish Kumar Sharrna though an offence was alleged to have been committed by him in the State of Uttar Pradesh. It was held that the mere apprehension of arrest by the petitioner in that case in Delhi at the instance of a case instituted against him in Delhi by his political adversaries gave jurisdiction to Delhi High Court to grant him anticipatory bail.
Pritam Singh And Anr. vs The State Of Punjab on 4 November, 1955
18. I respectfully agree with the conclusion arrived at by the Full Bench of the Patna High Court in Syed Zafrul Hassan's .case (1986 Cri LJ 605) (supra) as well as with the observations made by this Court in Pritam Singh's case (1980 Cri LJ 1174) (supra) and Ravinder Mohan Bakhshi's case (1984 Cri LJ 714) (supra). I, however, with respect disagree with the authorities cited by the counsel for the petitioner, and am of the view that this Court has got no jurisdiction to entertain the application of the petitioner for pre-arrest bail. The anguage of Section 438 of the Code, relevant portion of which is reproduced here under.