Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.22 seconds)

Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs Shamlal Balram Gurbani on 28 February, 2000

10. We find support from the judgments of Division Bench of Madhya Pradesh High Court in the case of Commissioner of Income- Tax vs. Vimla Khatri, (2007) 288 ITR 168 (MP) as well as in the case of Commissioner of Income-Tax vs. Smt. Maya Chotrani, (2007) 288 ITR 175 (MP), judgment of this Court in the case of M.R. Singhal vs. Assistant commissioner of Income-Tax, (2007) 290 ITR 162 (P&H) and judgment of Bombay High Court in the case of Commissioner of Income-Tax vs. Shamlal Balram Gurbani (2001) 249 ITR 501.
Bombay High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 40 - Full Document

Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs Vimla Khatri on 25 January, 2006

10. We find support from the judgments of Division Bench of Madhya Pradesh High Court in the case of Commissioner of Income- Tax vs. Vimla Khatri, (2007) 288 ITR 168 (MP) as well as in the case of Commissioner of Income-Tax vs. Smt. Maya Chotrani, (2007) 288 ITR 175 (MP), judgment of this Court in the case of M.R. Singhal vs. Assistant commissioner of Income-Tax, (2007) 290 ITR 162 (P&H) and judgment of Bombay High Court in the case of Commissioner of Income-Tax vs. Shamlal Balram Gurbani (2001) 249 ITR 501.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 4 - Full Document

Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs Smt. Maya Chotrani on 18 August, 2006

10. We find support from the judgments of Division Bench of Madhya Pradesh High Court in the case of Commissioner of Income- Tax vs. Vimla Khatri, (2007) 288 ITR 168 (MP) as well as in the case of Commissioner of Income-Tax vs. Smt. Maya Chotrani, (2007) 288 ITR 175 (MP), judgment of this Court in the case of M.R. Singhal vs. Assistant commissioner of Income-Tax, (2007) 290 ITR 162 (P&H) and judgment of Bombay High Court in the case of Commissioner of Income-Tax vs. Shamlal Balram Gurbani (2001) 249 ITR 501.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 9 - A Mishra - Full Document

M.R. Singhal vs Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax on 16 October, 2006

10. We find support from the judgments of Division Bench of Madhya Pradesh High Court in the case of Commissioner of Income- Tax vs. Vimla Khatri, (2007) 288 ITR 168 (MP) as well as in the case of Commissioner of Income-Tax vs. Smt. Maya Chotrani, (2007) 288 ITR 175 (MP), judgment of this Court in the case of M.R. Singhal vs. Assistant commissioner of Income-Tax, (2007) 290 ITR 162 (P&H) and judgment of Bombay High Court in the case of Commissioner of Income-Tax vs. Shamlal Balram Gurbani (2001) 249 ITR 501.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 4 - Full Document
1