Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.38 seconds)The Delhi Co-Operative Societies Act, 2003
Article 75 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Limitation Act, 1963
Section 129 in The Delhi Co-Operative Societies Act, 2003 [Entire Act]
Section 9 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
N.V.Srinivasa Murthy And Others vs Mariyamma (Dead) By Proposed Lrs And ... on 11 July, 2005
The Supreme Court in
N.V. Srinivasa Murthy Vs. Mariyamma, (2005) 5 SCC
548 has held that if on a critical examination of the
plaint, the suit seems to be clearly barred on the
facts stated in the plaint itself, the plaint is liable to
be rejected."
Sangita Rehan & Ors. vs Surinider Kishan Grover & Ors. on 13 October, 2014
It has also been held by Hon'ble High Court of
Delhi in Sangita Rehan Vs. Surinder Kishan Grover,
2015(218) DLT 305,
"It is settled law that an issue of limitation is not
always a mixed question of law and fact. Where a
suit, from statement in the plaint, can be said to be
barred by time, thus, a case for rejection under Order
7, Rule 11 CPC is made out.