Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.25 seconds)
Mathura Bai And Ors. vs Daryanamal And Ors. on 2 January, 1995 cites

Kartar Singh (Minor) Through Guardian ... vs Surjan Singh (Dead) And Ors on 16 August, 1974

13. The argument is totally misconceived. This Court had only directed in the earlier petition that the respondent had a right to pray for substitution and/ or transposition of petitioner No. 2 in place of the plaintiff/ petitioner No. 1 and that, if prayed, would be considered by the trial Court. The order of this Court was not of allowing the transposition. The substitution was opposed by petitioner No. 2 itself, i.e., the party sought to be substituted by the respondent for the plaintiff. Against the will of a party, the respondent/ defendant had no right to seek such substitution or transposition. The authority of this Court in Kartar Singh v. Konhai Singh, (1989 Jab LJ 461): (AIR 1989 Madh Pra 322) is not on the point and is of no avail to the respondents.
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 9 - A Alagiriswami - Full Document
1