Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.24 seconds)Section 411 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Sri Saifulla vs State Of Karnataka on 21 April, 2010
16. More over connecting evidence is not placed on record to complete chain
of events. No corroborating evidence in the form of DD entries vide which PWs have left
the police station for patrolling duty is proved on record. In my opinion the prosecution
was under an obligation to prove on record, the DD entries vide which the above said
police officials had left the PS to prove the availability of the said witness at the place of
apprehension of the accused. Thus, the evidence coming up on record does not inspire
confidence of the court. As held in Saifulla Vs. State 1998 (1) CCC 497 (Delhi) and
Abdul Gaffar Vs. State 1996 JCC 4097 (Delhi) in such circumstances, benefit of doubt
is to be given to the accused.
Section 313 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
1