Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.32 seconds)Section 482 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod vs State Of Maharashtra & Anr on 1 August, 2014
In fact in Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod Vs. State of Maharashtra, ((2014) 9 SCC 129), the Supreme Court held that prosecution for the offence of cheating can also be maintained along with a complaint for the offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.
S.Krishnamoorthy vs Chellammal on 31 March, 2015
10. The pendency of O.S.No.525 of 2010 cannot be a ground for quashing the prosecution inasmuch as the prayer in O.S.No.525 of 2010 is for permanent injunction restraining the defendant (complainant) from entering into or interfering in any manner with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff (A-3) in respect of the suit properties therein. As held by the Supreme Court in S.Krishnamurthy v. Chellammal, 2015 (4) Scale 371, this Court cannot go into the disputed question of fact while considering the petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. The complaint clearly discloses that Dr.Usha Muthukrishnan (A-2) is the Managing Partner and the impugned cheque was issued at her instance, which averments are sufficient to prosecute Dr.Usha Muthukrishnan (A-2) with the aid of Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Section 141 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
Section 88 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
1