Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.18 seconds)Article 21 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Kuldeep Singh vs The Commissioner Of Police & Ors on 17 December, 1998
In support of their
averments, the applicants have referred the judgment of
Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Kuldip Singh vs.
Commissioner of Police & Ors., (1999) 2 SCC 10 that
suspicion or presumption cannot take the place of proof
even in domestic inquiry. The applicants have also relied
upon various earlier judgments of this Tribunal on the
issue.
Kuldeep Singh Thr. Poa S.K. Bharti vs Union Of India on 2 May, 2016
In OA No.251/2012- S.N.Singh Bhati vs. Union
of India, this Bench has already taken a view that as per
10
Rule 11 of 1965 Rules, penalty of recovery can be imposed
only in exceptional circumstances and for special reasons to
be recorded in writing. The said order was challenged
before the Hon'ble High Court of Rajasthan by way of DB
Civil Writ Petition No.2494/2014 and the Hon'ble Rajasthan
High Court vide order dated 4th April, 2014 upheld the view
taken by this Tribunal and the same was further upheld by
the Hon'ble Apex Court in SLP No. 17525/2015 vide order
dated 1.12.2017.
1