Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.24 seconds)Mahesh Chandra Gupta, Advocate vs Union Of India & Ors on 6 July, 2009
"No. 14015/22/2010-AIS-1
Government of India
Ministry of Personnel Public Grievances & Pensions
Department of Personnel & Training
New Delhi, 10th September, 2010
To
The Chief Secretary
Government of Uttar Pradesh
Lucknow
(Kind attn: Shri Yogeshwar Ram Joint Secy.)
Sub: High Court Allahabad Lucknow Bench order
Dated 6th September, 2010 in WP No. 1718
(SB)/2006 in the matter of Mahesh Chand vs
UOI & Ors.- reg.
Hemraj Singh Chauhan vs Union Of India on 14 November, 2008
16. We may make it clear that the learned counsel for the respondent Nos.
1 & 2 has fairly stated that there is no question of malafides in the present
case. The learned counsel for the said respondents has also fairly stated as
we have already pointed out above, that no 'higher' claim is being made
except to seeking 'implementation' of the directions given by the Division
Bench of this High Court in Hemraj's case as approved by the Supreme
Court . We have already indicated that the understanding of the order as
represented by the learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 1 & 2 does not
appeal to us and, in our view, is not a correct understanding of the case.
Union Of India & Anr vs Hemraj Singh Chauhan & Ors on 23 March, 2010
10. The Union of India went up to the Supreme Court by way of a Special
Leave Petition in which the Supreme Court granted leave and after hearing
the matter disposed of the Civil Appeal No. 2651-52/2010 on 23.03.2010
(reported as Union of India & Anr. v. Hemraj Singh Chauhan & Anr:
1