Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 3 of 3 (0.18 seconds)Dineshwar Prasad Bakshi vs Parmeshwar Prasad Sinha on 11 February, 1988
Learned counsel then relerred to a decision of this Court in Dineshwar Pd. Bakshi v. Parmeshwar Pd. Sinha, 1988 BBCJ 449 : (AIR 1989 Pat 139). Alearned single Judge of this Court held that when no written statement was filed within the time granted by the Court, the Court while pronouncing the judgment should go into the merit of the case and any judgment without going into the merit of the case was wrong. The present Misc. Appeal is not an appeal against the judgment and decree of the Court below and, therefore, this Court is not called upon to decide that question. The judgment and the decree passed by the Court below is not before me as this appeal is not against that judgment and decree. As such the question urged by the learned counsel does not arise.
Section 5 in The Limitation Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
1