Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.74 seconds)

Ganpat vs State Of Haryana & Ors on 27 September, 2010

In this regard, the learned counsel appearing for the appellants makes reliance on the Judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Ganpat Vs. State of Haryana and others, reported in 2010 STPL 23023 SC : 2010 (12) SC 59 : 2011 (1) SCC (Crl) 309, wherein it has been held that "when two groups of people clashed inter se with weapons causing injuries to each other, we hold that the complainant party was the aggressor and in the absence of definite material and explanation from the prosecution side, the High Court was right in acquitting all the accused".
Supreme Court of India Cites 13 - Cited by 51 - P Sathasivam - Full Document

Dharmaraj vs The Inspector Of Police on 2 March, 2015

21. Applying the said dictum laid down by the Division Bench to the facts of the present case, if we analyze the facts of the present case, in our considered, the evidence of PW-1, given during cross-examination, after a lapse of four years, is liable to be disregarded/eschewed and accordingly, it is discharged/eschewed. Thus, from the narration of the above, we hold that it was this first accused, who stabbed the deceased indiscriminately, which resulted in his death.
Madras High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 5 - A Selvam - Full Document
1