Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.25 seconds)Section 50 in The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985
Muralidhar @ Gidda & Anr vs State Of Karnataka on 9 April, 2014
It is consistent legal position with regard to the scope and interference by the High Court in the judgement and order of acquittal. The Apex Court in the case of Murlidhar @ Gidda & Anr. Vs. State of Karnataka decided on 09.04.2014 in Criminal Appeal No. 791 of 2011 has observed as under:
Basappa vs State Of Karnataka on 27 February, 2014
Reference, may also be made to the judgment of the Apex Court rendered in the cases of Basappa Vs. State of Karnataka decided on 27.02.2014 passed in Criminal Appeal No. 512 of 2014, Ashok Rai Vs. State of U.P. & Ors, Decided on 15.04.2014 in Criminal Appeal No. 1508 of 2005, Ramesh Harijan vs. State of U.P. 2012 AIR SCW 2990, Murugesan vs. State through Inspector of Police reported in 2012 AIR SCW 5627, which also lay down the same proposition of law on the point.
Section 417 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
1