Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 27 (0.30 seconds)

Bengaluru Development Authority vs Mr. Sudhakar Hegde on 17 March, 2020

5. The impugned Ext.P8 notification cannot be retrospective. The amendments under the EIA notification, 2006 are only prospective in application, unless clarificatory in nature, as held by the Apex Court in Bengaluru Development Authority v. Sudhakar Hegde [(2020) 15 SCC 63]. The word 'existing' as used in sub-paragraph no. 2 is missing in sub-clause no. 4 of clause no. 9 of Ext.P8 notification, wherefore, the subject notification/Ext.P8 cannot apply to the existing E.Cs.
Supreme Court of India Cites 31 - Cited by 39 - D Y Chandrachud - Full Document
1   2 3 Next