Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 18 (0.74 seconds)
Ims Learning Resources Priavate ... vs Young Achievers on 20 January, 2025 cites

Fedders North American vs Show Line And Ors. on 12 May, 2006

(a) In Fedders North American v. Show Line, reported in 2006 (32) PTC 573 (DEL), it has been held that after termination of the agreement dated 21st May, 1956, plaintiff had given right to defendant No. 18 to use the trade mark "Fedders" for a period of five years, by virtue of the agreement dated 11th October, 1963. It was held that after this period came to an end in the year 1968, use of trade mark "Fedders" by defendant No. 18 from 1968 onwards was not in line with the rights available to the plaintiff as a registered proprietor of trademark "Fedders".
Delhi High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 6 - M B Lokur - Full Document

Rob Mathys India Pvt. Ltd. vs Synthes Ag Chur on 29 May, 1997

(b) In Rob Mathys India Pvt. Ltd. v. Synthes Ag Chur, reported in 1997 (17) PTC 669 (DB), this Court echoed the view expressed by the Supreme Court in Power Control Appliances v. Sumeet Machines Pvt. Ltd., reported in 1994 (2) SC 17 to the effect that it is a settled Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed CS(COMM) 602/2018 Page 29 of 54 By:AMAN UNIYAL Signing Date:20.01.2025 15:31:26 principle of law relating to trademarks that there can be only one mark, one source and one proprietor. A trademark cannot have two origins. It was held that after termination of the collaboration agreement between the parties to that litigation, the appellant therein, not the owner of the trademark, could not use the word "Synthes" or the trademark "AO/ASIF" after revocation of the collaboration agreement.
Delhi High Court Cites 74 - Cited by 19 - S N Kapoor - Full Document

Power Control Appliances vs Sumeet Machines Pvt. Ltd on 8 February, 1994

(b) In Rob Mathys India Pvt. Ltd. v. Synthes Ag Chur, reported in 1997 (17) PTC 669 (DB), this Court echoed the view expressed by the Supreme Court in Power Control Appliances v. Sumeet Machines Pvt. Ltd., reported in 1994 (2) SC 17 to the effect that it is a settled Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed CS(COMM) 602/2018 Page 29 of 54 By:AMAN UNIYAL Signing Date:20.01.2025 15:31:26 principle of law relating to trademarks that there can be only one mark, one source and one proprietor. A trademark cannot have two origins. It was held that after termination of the collaboration agreement between the parties to that litigation, the appellant therein, not the owner of the trademark, could not use the word "Synthes" or the trademark "AO/ASIF" after revocation of the collaboration agreement.
Supreme Court of India Cites 17 - Cited by 252 - S Mohan - Full Document
1   2 Next