Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 42 (1.35 seconds)

Satwant Singh Sawhney vs D. Ramarathnam, Assistant Passport ... on 10 April, 1967

The right to, go abroad, and in particular to a specified country, is clearly right to personal liberty exercisable outside India and yet it has been held in Satwant Singh Sawhney's case to be a fundamental right protected by Article 21. This clearly shows that there is no underlying principle in the Constitution which limits the fundamental rights in their operation to the territory of India. If a fundamental right under Article 21 can be exercisable outside India, why can freedom of speech and expression conferred under Article 19(1) (a) be not so exercisable ?
Supreme Court of India Cites 30 - Cited by 188 - K S Rao - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 Next