Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.37 seconds)Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 308 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 323 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 376 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Virendra Singh vs State Of M.P on 9 August, 2010
62. In view of the foregoing discussions, it can be held that presence of all the
accused at the scene of crime and their purpose, on the given date and time stand
proved. It is also proved that all the accused gave beating to PW3, PW7 and PW8 on
their vital body part. All the accused aided each other in commission of the offence. As
such, the active participation of all the accused in the incident stands proved.
Therefore, it can be held that all the accused shared the common intention to beat
PW3, PW7 and PW8 and in furtherance of their common intention, they had beaten
them and inflicted injuries on them. Hence, the injuries sustained by PW3, PW7 and
PW8 were attributable to all the accused persons. Reliance is placed upon the judgment
passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in case titled as "Virendra Singh vs. State of
Madhya Pradesh", in reported in (2010) 8 SCC 407.
1