Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 20 (0.24 seconds)Section 139 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
Section 27 in The General Clauses Act, 1897 [Entire Act]
Section 118 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
Section 27 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
Section 114 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
Section 114 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
M/S Kumar Exports vs M/S Sharma Carpets on 16 December, 2008
20. This Court held that the accused may adduce
evidence to rebut the presumption, but mere denial
regarding existence of debt shall not serve any purpose.
The following was held in para 20: (Sharma Carpets
case [Kumar Exports v. Sharma Carpets, (2009) 2 SCC
513 : (2009) 1 SCC (Civ) 629 : (2009) 1 SCC (Cri) 823]
, SCC p. 520)
"20. ... The accused may adduce direct evidence
to prove that the note in question was not