cites: 744167

Madan Gopal Kanodia vs Mamraj Maniram And Ors. on 15 January, 1976

In Madan Gopal Kanodia v. Mamraj Maniram the Supreme Court has held that as per the provisions of Order 13 Rule 2 of the CPC, the Court has powers to allow the production of documents if satisfactory reasons are given.

Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 54 - S M Ali - Full Document

Collector Land Acquisition, Anantnag & ... vs Mst. Katiji & Ors on 19 February, 1987

In Collector, Land Acquisition, Anantnag v. Mst. Katiji and Ors. the Supreme Court has taken the view that liberal approach should be adopted to condone the delay in approaching the Courts.

Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 5846 - M P Thakkar - Full Document

Asian Paints Limited vs The Assistant Registrar Of Trade Marks ... on 10 February, 2005

In Asian Paints Limited v. Registrar of Trade Marks and Anr. 2005 (30) PTC 444 (IPAB) this Board has held that the powers of the Registrar under Section 131 of the Act is not affected to grant extension in filing evidence in opposition.

Intellectual Property Appellate Board Cites 11 - Cited by 10 - Full Document

Cadila Laboratories Ltd. And Anr. vs Dabur India Limited on 31 March, 1997

13. Learned Counsel for the first respondent relied on Judgment in Cadila Laboratories Ltd. v. Dabur India Limited 1997 (17) PTC 417 in support of his contention that the prefix of the word should be given due weightage and importance in case the suffix is common.

Delhi High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 25 - Full Document

Cadila Healthcare Limited vs Cadila Pharmaceuticals Limited on 26 March, 2001

19. As has been observed by the Supreme Court in the case of Cadila Health Care Ltd. v. Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd. for deciding the question of deceptive similarity, the following factors have to be considered:

Supreme Court of India Cites 20 - Cited by 545 - Full Document