Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 16 (0.23 seconds)Isham Singh And Ors. vs State Of Haryana on 20 February, 2004
The Apex Court in the case of Isham Singh (supra) observed
that power under section 319 is to be exercised sparingly and primarily
to advance cause of criminal justice. Merely because the complainant
names petitioner by attributing specific injury to them cannot infer their
involvement in crime particularly when version of complainant was an
improvement of his earlier written version and more so, when there was
enmity between the parties.
Bindeshwari Prasad Singh vs Kali Singh on 28 July, 1975
In the case of Bindeshwari Prasad Singh (supra) the Apex
Court held that there is no provision in Cr.P.C. empowering the learned
Magistrate to review or recall a judicial order passed by him. Inherent
power under section 561(a) (Old Code) conforming to section 482 (new
Code) is vested with High Court only, unlike section 151 C.P.C. which is
available both to subordinate courts as well.
Section 151 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Section 147 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 148 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 149 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 161 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
State Of Himachal Pradesh vs Krishan Lal Pardhan And Ors. on 5 February, 1987
In support of his contention the learned counsel relied upon a
decision in the case of Krishna Lal Pradhan & Ors (supra), Isham Singh
Vs State of Haryana(supra) and Bindeshwari Singh Vs Kali Singh
(supra).